In the Crossroads: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities in Community-Engaged Research with Nonprofits and Academia


Sara Cumming, Sheridan College

The Community Ideas Factory is an innovative project funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Councils Community and College Social Innovation Fund (SSHRC-CCSIF). This transformative initiative embraces the principles of community-engaged research by fostering a dynamic collaboration between academics, 15 diverse non-profit organizations, and the local community. The projects primary goal was to co-create a client-centric, applied, and equity, diversity, and inclusivity (EDI) informed virtual life skills program that addresses the unique needs of the community. The secondary goal was to help all 15 non-profits reduce costs with a cocreated shared life skills curriculum versus each running their own programming. The projects structure is rooted in community engagement, where academics and non-profits work hand-in-hand to develop a virtual life skills program that is not only theoretically sound but also practically relevant to the lived experiences of community members struggling with homelessness. The collaboration encompasses a range of stakeholders, including academic researchers, practitioners from non-profit organizations, and individuals from the community, ensuring a comprehensive and inclusive approach. The virtual life skills program, designed with an EDI lens, aimed to empower individuals within the community and prevent repeat bouts of homelessness by providing them with practical, applicable skills that enhance their daily lives. From financial literacy to mental health resources, the program seeks to address the diverse needs of community members, with a particular emphasis on those who are often marginalized or underrepresented. The project, however, is not without its challenges, as tensions arise between the non-profits and academics involved. Non-profit organizations are under significant pressure to deliver tangible outcomes to their funders, often measured through concrete metrics and immediate impact. On the other hand, academics are committed to conducting research that is both valid and reliable, adhering to rigorous academic standards that may not align with the fast-paced, outcome-driven expectations of non-profits. One notable tension revolves around the differing timelines and priorities of the two sectors. Non-profits, driven by the urgency of meeting immediate community needs and fulfilling funding requirements, often seek quick results. In contrast, academics emphasize the importance of methodological rigor, sometimes leading to slower research processes. Balancing these distinct timelines poses a challenge but is crucial for the projects success. Additionally, conflicting expectations regarding the definition of success and impact may arise. Non-profits, being accountable to their funders and communities, may measure success through tangible, short-term outcomes. Academics, however, may emphasize the importance of long-term impact and knowledge generation, which may not align seamlessly with the immediate needs of non-profits. Addressing these tensions requires ongoing communication, flexibility, and a shared commitment to the projects overarching goals. The Community Ideas Factory exemplifies the potential for collaboration between academia and non-profits to bridge these gaps and create a meaningful impact on community well-being. Through open dialogue and a shared understanding of each sectors priorities, the project strives to navigate these tensions, ensuring that the resulting virtual life skills program is not only academically robust but also practically effective and responsive to the needs of the community.

Non-presenting author: Julianne DiSanto, Sheridan College

This paper will be presented at the following session: